5 comments

Buhari Led FG Feeding Flames of Recent Biafra Agitation

by on April 26, 2016
 
Harvard-trained econ­omist and former Anambra State gover­nor, Dr Chukwuemeka Eze­ife has stated that renewed agitations for the revalida­tion of Republic of Biafra is a reaction to unfairness, in­justice, iniquities, and ineq­uities against the South-East by policies of the federal gov­ernment headed by President Muhammadu Buhari.
In a letter to the Northern Elders, Ezeife listed some al­leged governance goofs by the current administration as excluding a South-east per­son in his first 40 appoint­ments, the withdrawal of the appointment of an easterner at NIMASA three days after announcement, failure to ap­point a South-East person to even the sixth and least pro­tocol position in government, in a six geo-political zone structure.
Further listing other related issues, Ezeife said that not one Igbo person is in the National Security Council, spilling the blood of South-Eastern youths at Aba, Onitsha and many other places, and disre­spect for rule of law by keep­ing Nnamdi Kanu in deten­tion despite court orders for his release on bail.
Still others, according to the elder statesman include un­disguised hatred for the Igbo, and the repugnant case of se­curity agencies arresting and detaining 76 youths who tried to repel the rampaging Fulani herdsmen from their farms in Enugu State, amongst others.
In a terse six-point letter titled, “Letter to Northern Elders and all Nigerians on the Northern Elders letter to the President,” released over the weekend, Ezeife, a former federal permanent secretary, addressed the issues raised by them in their letter.
Frowning against the use of Ambassador Maitama Sule, who he described as “symbol of One Nigeria from the deep North,” as a signatory, he que­ried why they did not use “Dr Junaid Mohammed the irre­dentist deep Northerner, who appears to be disdainful of other Nigerians” instead for the hatchet job.
He saluted their courage in pointing out some of the criti­cal negative factors responsi­ble for the rapid decline of the Nigerian economy (the col­lapse of the Naira, serious loss of values in the stock market, the unprecedented high level of suffering of the Nigerian people etc), adding that the letter also implies the inac­cessibility of the president for advice by those who should know.
While further scrutinizing the letter, he agreed with their call for “immediate establish­ment of an economic man­agement team; ¾ raising the ‘quality of advice and support the president requires,’ and for him to conclude the ap­pointment of key officers and advisers,” adding, however, that they forgot to remind the president that “these officers may not all be available from Daura or even Katsina.”
He further praised them for noting the “evident weakness and gaps in skills, compe­tences, experience and (even) integrity,” for believing the al­legations “that Boko Haram still has substantial presence in many areas near Maiduguri and other towns and villages,” and for expressing doubt about “quality of intelligence, and leadership of the Armed Forces,” urging the president to handle their advice with the urgency it deserves, hav­ing come from a friendly di­rection.
Turning to the claim of southern dominance in re­current expenditure, Ezeife explained that not all recur­rent expenditure is personnel emolument. It includes, ac­cording to him, operational and logistics cost of gover­nance, citing the president’s foreign trips, “contributions to OIC and to Saudi-spon­sored anti-¬terrorism fund; payment for power, fuel, sta­tionery, etc.”
He challenged their postur­ing of being the “backbone of the Buhari administra­tion, informing them “that the backbone of anything, or body, or an administration should be an asset, not a li­ability or a leakage.”
“The North takes by far, more than it contributes to the coffers of Nigeria. Neither in funding or expertise, can it be said that the North is the backbone of a Nigerian gov­ernment. Or did they mean that the North voted most for Buhari? That was in the past, even if it is the truth. What about the West, from which Buhari is not?”
Reacting to their recom­mendation that the president should bring the ‘full weight of the law on IPOB, (Indig­enous People of Biafra) he de­manded that it should be “full weight of respect for court decisions, human rights, rights to self-determination, which the United Nations has removed from the internal af­fairs of a state, etc.”
“Answering some of the is­sues raised in the elders’ letter is like chasing rats while the house
is burning. The Fulani North does have the right to, and should advise their son, on winning ways: in politics, economics and social rela­tions,” he further elaborated. The elder statesman urged the northern elders to advise the president on the neglect of the South-East and the pro­motion of Biafra.
He accused the president of taking actions that make “non-pretenders in the South-East feel exposed to gross in­equity, injustice as unfairness; marginalization, discrimina­tion, as not being seen as full-fledged Nigerian nationals, or not qualified to hold the high­est office in the land.”

comments
 
Leave a reply »

 

Leave a Response