The court said its decision was to await the outcome of an appeal filed by the senatorial candidate of the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) in the general election, Osita Izunaso.
Izunaso had gone to court to challenge the decision of the High Court to assume jurisdiction over the case Okorocha brought before it.
Izunaso, in his six grounds of appeal, argued that the High Court was wrong when it exercised jurisdiction to join the PDP as a defendant in the suit.
Izunaso contended that the court ought to have firstly determined whether or not it had any jurisdiction to entertain Okorocha’s case, before it proceeded to join other interested parties to the suit.
Izunaso further argued that Justice Abang misapplied the principles in the decision of Inakoju V Adeleke (2007) LPELR-1510 (SC) and order 29 (1)(a) of the Federal High Court Civil Procedure rules 2009, which dealt with a situation where a court is faced with the issue of determining a challenge of its jurisdiction and the hearing of the substantive suit.
Izunaso contended that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to continue with the hearing and determination of any matter relating to the suit, including the application filed by the PDP, without hearing applications challenging its jurisdiction.