0 comments

FLASH| Court Denies Nnamdi Kanu Bail, Again

by on January 29, 2016
 

A Federal High Court in Abuja has refused a bail request by the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu. The court also decided that Nnamdi Kanu must remain in prison pending his trial for alleged treason.

Mr. Nnamdi Kanu has been in detention since his arrest in October 2015.  He had earlier been granted bail twice by the courts, but the government refused to release him

Nnamdi Kanu court

In a related news, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, has asked that the lawyer who served as his lead counsel in previous sittings, M. U. Udechukwu, step down for a Mr.Chucks Muoma.

READ  Fashola Pledges FG's Commitment To Complete 2nd Niger Bridge

Mr. Nnamdi Kanu wrote to the court, ahead of Friday’s sitting, asking that there should be a change in his representation.
In the letter, read during a dramatic session, the judge, John Tsoho said he was asked to change Mr. Kanu’s lead counsel, because according to Mr. Kanu, the person who represented him in previous sittings was different from the person he had instructed.

When lawyers announced their appearances, Mr. Udechukwu told the court that he had been informed of the letter, saying he would immediately stand down for Mr. Muoma to continue the case.  Mr. Muoma said he was surprised that Mr. Udechukwu had raised the issue so early.

READ  DSS Declaring Mrs. Nnamdi Kanu Wanted, A big Joke - IPOB

He said he had told Mr. Udechukwu that there was a letter to that effect, but that he should first complete the bail application he was handling, before withdrawing.

In his reaction, Mr. Udechukwu insisted on handing over the case, because the letter said he had impersonated the lead counsel at previous hearings.
Mr. Udechukwu said impersonation, a serious offence, could affect his legal profession of almost 20 years.

He therefore prayed the court to record his apology for the said offence, and that the court should note that he was withdrawing from the case.
The judge, Mr. Tsoho, who had earlier hesitated to read the letter, regarding it as an issue that should be resolved by the counsels, asked to know the name of the particular counsel he would record for Mr. Kanu.
Mr. Muoma told the court that he and Mr. Ejiofor would take the place of the defendant’s counsel.  Mr. Udechukwu told the court that his withdrawal would affect the other counsels who came with him.

Be the first to comment!
 
Leave a reply »

 

Leave a Response