0 comments

Hundreds Of Women Just Won A Landmark Case Against Johnson & Johnson Over Pelvic Mesh Implants

by on November 21, 2019
 

Hundreds of women living in pain after they were fitted with transvaginal mesh devices have won a landmark class action case against Ethicon, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson.

Seven years after a class action involving more than 1,350 women began, the Federal Court’s Justice Anna Katzmann handed down a searing judgement in which she found Ethicon had acted negligently, and that patients should be compensated.

“We were treated like guinea pigs,” one of the applicants, Julie Davis, told reporters outside court on Thursday. “They lied about it and did nothing to help.”

Urogynaecological meshes, sometimes known as transvaginal meshes, are inserted into women as a treatment option for pelvic organ prolapse (when the connective tissue securing the vagina and uterus to the pelvis gives way after childbirth), or urinary incontinence.

“[Ethicon] were liable to compensate any applicant and/or group member who suffered an injury because of the defect for the amount of the loss and damage she sustained as a result of that injury,” Katzmann said in an hour-long summary of her judgement on Thursday morning. “I also found that [Ethicon] engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct.”

Katzmann said how much each woman would be entitled to in the compensation payout will be decided early next year.

READ  Court orders Malabu Oil Well be forfeited to FG

She began the judgement by acknowledging the impact complications associated with the devices have had on the three lead complainants in the class action.

Katzmann detailed how Kathryn Gill had been fitted with “a large quantity of polypropylene mesh” known as “Prolift Total” to treat vaginal prolapse, which she sustained after the birth of her second child. Six months after she got the Ethicon device in 2007, Gill “could feel something sharp inside her vagina and a tearing sensation resulting in sharp pain”, Katzmann said.

“The mesh had eroded and a piece of mesh was piercing the front wall of her vagina,” Katzmann told the court, adding that Gill had undergone three surgeries to remove portions of the mesh. “The complications of the mesh surgery have taken a great physical and emotional toll on her. She now lives with constant pelvic pain… sometimes the pain is so bad she struggles to breathe.”

Shine Lawyers, which ran the class action on behalf of the women, alleged that the warnings accompanying the implants were inadequate and that the implants caused an unacceptable rate of complications including erosion, incontinence and chronic pain.

READ  UN, Regional Forces and the Need to Save Humanity

South Australian woman and member of the class action Kim Blieschke travelled to Sydney for Katzmann’s judgment.

“We are all debilitated, we all suffer in pain every day but it is just nice to have that acknowledgement,” Blieschke told BuzzFeed News. “That it is not in our heads, it is something that we live every day.”

Blieschke had Ethicon’s ProLift technology, a polypropylene mesh implant, inserted into her vaginal wall to treat a pelvic organ prolapse. The procedure was described by her doctor as minor, temporary and uncomplicated, but from the moment she woke up from her transvaginal mesh implant surgery in 2006, her life has been defined by debilitating pain and repeated surgeries.

Blieschke said “no amount of compensation” would make up for the “pain and suffering” she, and other women, had suffered over the past decade.

“We suffer every day and those complications are lifelong,” she said.

Katzmann reminded the court on Thursday of evidence given given in cross-examination by urogynaecologist Dr Piet Hinoul, Ethicon’s former vice-president of medical affairs. He admitted from the time each of the Ethicon devices was supplied anywhere in the world, Ethicon knew it could cause a range of complications.

READ  4 Killed in Cult Clash (PICTURES)

These complications included a foreign body reaction to surrounding tissue that would lead to pain and a risk of mesh exposure and extrusion into the vaginal canal or other organs.

“[Ethicon knew] all the devices could cause both acute and chronic pain, that chronic pain could be very damaging and debilitating, indeed life altering, and that multiple operations might be necessary to attempt to alleviate the pain,” Katzmann said.

Shine Lawyers special counsel for class actions Rebecca Jancauskas said as many as 8,000 Australian women are thought to have been adversely impacted by pelvic mesh systems.

“Today’s decision is a win for Australian women,” Jancauskas told reporters outside the Federal Court on Thursday afternoon. “Today the court was scathing in its findings.”

Jancauskas said it had been an “extremely hard-fought legal battle” which had taken a toll on the “brave women” involved.

“Given the years of suffering these women have endured, the fact that their lives have been turned upside down and they can no longer function as women, as mothers and as employees, we would expect [the compensation] to be significant,” she said.

Ethicon has 21 days to lodge an appeal.

Be the first to comment!
 
Leave a reply »

 

Leave a Response